��ѿ��ý

Intranasal COVID-19 vaccine effective in animal studies

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, emerging from the surface of a cell cultured in the lab. The spikes on the outer edge of the virus particles give coronaviruses their name, crown-like. NIAID Rocky Mountain Laboratories

Vaccines are greatly reducing the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths. Those developed early in the pandemic continue to provide protection against severe disease caused by new variants of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease.

All COVID-19 vaccines now in use are injected into the muscle (intramuscularly). Intramuscular injection produces antibodies that circulate in the blood to recognize the virus. But this route of administration doesn’t necessarily produce antibodies in the nose and nasal passages.

This has raised the possibility that vaccinated people could still catch and spread the virus, even when they don’t know they’re infected. Scientists have proposed that vaccines given through the nose (intranasally) may be able to block SARS-CoV-2 in both the nasal passages and bloodstream.

Researchers led by Dr. Vincent Munster from NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) tested intranasal delivery of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine in hamsters and monkeys. The results were published on July 27, 2021, in Science Translational Medicine.

The team first compared spraying the vaccine intranasally to intramuscular injection in hamsters. Both routes of administration produced high levels of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood after a single dose. Levels of antibodies in blood were actually higher after intranasal administration.

Vaccinated hamsters and a group of unvaccinated animals were then exposed to SARS-CoV-2, either by direct administration into the nose or through contact with infected hamsters. Both routes of vaccine administration protected hamsters from serious disease. Unvaccinated hamsters lost weight and showed signs of lung damage, but vaccinated hamsters did not. The animals that received intranasal vaccination also had substantially less infectious virus in their nasal passages than unvaccinated animals.

The researchers next tested two doses of the intranasal vaccine in four monkeys. As in the hamsters, antibodies were found in the blood after the second dose, at levels similar to those seen in people who have recovered from COVID-19. 

The monkeys were then exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Compared to four unvaccinated monkeys, those that received the intranasal vaccine had less virus in their noses and in lung tissue. Three of the unvaccinated animals tested developed symptoms of pneumonia, while none of the vaccinated monkeys did.

More work is needed to understand the differences in immune response between the two routes of administration. “But these results justify additional tests of nasal delivery for COVID-19 vaccines in people,” Munster says.

A clinical trial at the University of Oxford is now testing intranasal vaccination in human volunteers.